These are not business questions, but soft questions that should make any PhD candidate relaxed, even intrigued, and open to talk freely. There is no wrong answer, these are open questions, but some answers could hint that the candidate is still in his/her PhD bubble, feeling superior, not flexible, and unable to see the big picture behind the apparently innocent question. These questions were asked discretely, none of the responders knew about my PhD mathematical background.
Author of this article (myself)
I've posted them on Quora, Reddit, and other platforms attracting PhD scientists. Below is a summary of what I experienced.
Are all numbers created equal? Are prime numbers superior to other numbers?
While this looks like an innocent question (mostly a philosophical question that appeals to math PhD's), answers that are a red flag -- and I have seen many of them -- include:
This mindset is typical of someone not flexible to think out of the box, and can be an indicator of tunnel vision. One interesting answer was:
Even a better answer would be about how do you measure "superiority", for instance by computing how many times a number such as 343 appears in social networks and search results, compared to a number such as Pi or e. Then the discussion could shift to how do you count occurrences of Pi, 3.14, or e = 2.71828182..., on the Internet, since the first one is a Greek character, and the last one an English character. How do you go about identifying the popularity of such numbers? This is indeed a great interview question for data scientists, especially in the context of natural language processing.
Are the digits of Pi random?
A typical answer that would make me reluctant to hire the candidate, is:
Some numbers indeed do not have any kind of digit distribution in their decimal representation, but they are hard to find and all known cases are artificially manufactured, see here. The immense majority of numbers have a uniform ("random") distribution for their digits, with exceptions including numbers such as 1/7 and all fractions in general. To this day, no one has been able to prove or disprove that Pi or any other popular mathematical constant, has "random" digits. Pi is highly suspected of having "random-like" digits.
However, this was not the purpose of the question. Very few people know this fact, even among PhD statisticians. I was hoping for an answer that is philosophical, but not technical in nature (after all, PhD stands for Doctorate in Philosophy.) Maybe an answer about how you define randomness, and ideas to test it. Even an answer such as "probably" or "probably not" or "don't know" would have been much better, especially if accompanied by insightful reasons for being unsure, or for believing or not in that hypothesis. Discussing the implications of the randomness (or lack of) in the context of business applications (cryptography), would have been interesting too.
For related articles from the same author, click here or visit www.VincentGranville.com. Follow me on on LinkedIn.
DSC Resources
Comment
I'm with Emil, if posed questions such as these I'd immediately request some definitions. Not for the sake of being contrary or obstructionist, but simply to ensure that I'm answering the question that the questioner intended. Otherwise any resulting dialog becomes an aimless game of no true Scotsman, each of us walking circles about our disjointed definitions of what constitutes "equal", "superior", and "random."
I find this especially important when dealing with the classic case where a naive online questioner asks, "What is the best way to <x>?" (As if the criteria that define "best" were obvious and universally accepted.)
I really like the first question. For me, all numbers are created for a reason hence they are equal. I think the discussion about superiority might be a bit subjective. Depending on your background you can argue that some numbers are indeed superior to others which I think would be very interesting to see what affects the perception of numbers superiority.
Your question "Are all numbers created equal" led me to remember documentaries about the importance of the use of a symbol representing zero; and of the phrase "one, two, many". I found a helpful article on the one, two, many idea here.
Queue discussion on All numbers are equal, but 0, 1, and 2 are more equal than others :-)
The first answers that popped into my head were "define superior" and "define random". But my PhD candidacy was a many decades ago. Many years ago, someone asked whether MIT students were "nerds". My response was "define nerd". Perhaps that immediately labelled me as a nerd.
© 2018 Data Science Central™ Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
You need to be a member of Data Science Central to add comments!
Join Data Science Central