originally posted by the author on Linkedin : Link
It is very tempting for data science practitioners to opt for the best known algorithms for a given problem.However It’s not the algorithm alone , which can provide the best solution ; Model built on carefully engineered and selected features can provide far better results.
"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius -- and a lot of courage -- to move in the opposite direction."- Albert Einstein
The complex models are not easily interpretable and tougher to tune. Simpler algorithms, with better features or more data can perform far better than a weak assumption accompanied with a complex model.
Better features means flexibility, simpler models, better results. Presence of irrelevant features hurt generalization. Thus feature selection and feature engineering should not be considered as mutually exclusive activities and should be performed in conjunction to each other. With the help of an effective feature engineering process, we intend to come up with an effective representation of the data. The question arises, what is considered to be a good or bad representation?
Representation is as good as the information it contains.
Entropy: Higher the entropy, more the information contained in the data , variance: higher the variance: more the information , projection for better separation: the projection to the basis which has the highest variance holds more information, feature to class association etc , all of these explains the information in data.
Feature engineering is a vital component of modelling process, and it is the toughest to automate. It takes domain expertise and a lot of exploratory analysis on the data to engineer features
1. single variable Basic transformations: x, x^2 ,sqrt x ,log x, scaling
2. If variable's distribution has a long tail, apply Box-Cox transformation (taking log() is a quick & dirty way).
3. One could also perform analysis of residuals or log-odds (for linear model) to check for strong nonlinearities.
4. Create a feature which captures the frequency of the occurrence of each level of the categorical variable. For high cardinality, this helps a lot. One might use ratio/percentage of a particular level to all the levels present.
5. For every possible value of the variable, estimate the mean of the target variable; use the result as an engineered feature.
6. Encode a variable with the ratio of the target variable.
7. Take the two most important variables and throw in second order interactions between them and the rest of the variables - compare the resulting model to the original linear one
8. if you feel your solutions should be smooth, you can apply a radial basis function kernel . This is like applying a smoothing transform.
9. If you feel you need covariates , you can apply a polynomial kernel, or add the covariates explicitly
10. High cardinality features : convert to numeric by preprocessing: out-of-fold average two variable combinations
11. Additive transformation
12. difference relative to baseline
13. Multiplicative transformation : interactive effects
14. divisive : scaling/normalisation
15. thresholding numerical features to get boolean values
16. Cartesian Product Transformation
17. Feature crosses: cross product of all features -- Consider a feature A, with two possible values {A1, A2}. Let B be a feature with possibilities {B1, B2}. Then, a feature-cross between A & B (let’s call it AB) would take one of the following values: {(A1, B1), (A1, B2), (A2, B1), (A2, B2)}. You can basically give these ‘combinations’ any names you like. Just remember that every combination denotes a synergy between the information contained by the corresponding values of A and B.
18. Normalization Transformation: -- One of the implicit assumptions often made in machine learning algorithms (and somewhat explicitly in Naive Bayes) is that the the features follow a normal distribution. However, sometimes we may find that the features are not following a normal distribution but a log normal distribution instead. One of the common things to do in this situation is to take the log of the feature values (that exhibit log normal distribution) so that it exhibits a normal distribution.If the algorithm being used is making the implicit/explicit assumption of the features being normally distributed, then such a transformation of a log-normally distributed feature to a normally distributed feature can help improve the performance of that algorithm.
19. Quantile Binning Transformation
20. whitening the data
21. Windowing -- If points are distributed in time axis, previous points in the same window are often very informative
22. Min-max normalization : does not necessarily preserve order
23. sigmoid / tanh / log transformations
24. Handling zeros distinctly – potentially important for Count based features
25. Decorrelate / transform variables
26. Reframe Numerical Quantities
27. Map infrequent categorical variables to a new/separate category.
28.Sequentially apply a list of transforms.
29. One Hot Encoding
30. Target rate encoding
Hash Trick Multivariate:
31. PCA
32. MODEL STACKING
33. compressed sensing
34..guess the average” or “guess the average segmented by variable X”
Projection : new basis
35. Hack projection:
36.Sparse coding -- choose basis : evaluate the basis based on how well you can use it to reconstruct the input and how sparse it is take some sort of gradient step to improve that evaluation
37 :Random forest: train bunch of decision trees :use each leaf as a feature
Comment
Amazing article. I have always wondered the best practices and ways for feature engineering. I was wondering if someone can point me to more resources on model stacking.
Thank you for this article. Each of the point you have mentioned is a topic in itself. A condensed view of all of feature engineering is an excellent reference material. Very useful article
Can there be some explanation about suggestions under numbers 4 & 5??
Suggestion 5, specifically, sounds like "data leakage", or in other words, a self-fulfilling attribute since it's defined by the target variable...
Academic research has been investigating feature selection and construction for long long time now and many phd theses were produced in this topic. It seems the commercial data scientists are not following what is been published !
ery good
© 2019 Data Science Central ® Powered by
Badges | Report an Issue | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
Most Popular Content on DSC
To not miss this type of content in the future, subscribe to our newsletter.
Other popular resources
Archives: 2008-2014 | 2015-2016 | 2017-2019 | Book 1 | Book 2 | More
Most popular articles
You need to be a member of Data Science Central to add comments!
Join Data Science Central